Question

You attempted to convince the jury that the presence of the fingerprints did not mean anything " it was his bat, after all, and he had used it in a softball game recently. You argued that the detectives investigating the murder suspected your client right away because he was the victim's ex-boyfriend, and accordingly, they automatically interpreted any evidence in a way that agreed with their suspicion. This is an example of:
a. cognitive dissonance
b. selective information processing
c. noble-cause
d. harmless error

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1 characters.