Question

Which of the following conditions is necessary for whistle-blowing to be morally permissible, but not morally obligatory?
A. The whistle-blower has documented evidence that would convince a reasonable, impartial observer that one's view of the situation is correct, and that the company's product poses a serious danger to the public.
B. The employee has good reason to believe that by going public, the necessary changes will be brought about.
C. The whistle-blower has reason to believe that he/she will be seen as failing to be loyal to the company.
D. The employee has exhausted the internal procedures and possibilities within the firm, maybe even to the board of directors.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1 characters.