Question

When reaching for a bottle of lemonade from a display of lemonade bottles inside a Target store, Russell slipped and fell on the floor where a very small puddle of lemonade had spilled next to the display. In the fall, Russell broke his ankle and leg and required months of treatment for his injuries. None of the Target store employees were aware of the lemonade on the floor before Russell slipped on it. Based on the court's reasoning in Case 7.1, Martin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., if Russell sues Target for damages, he will most likely
a. win, because it was foreseeable that some of the lemonade from the display would end up on the floor.
b. win, because the thing speaks for itself
c. lose, because Target cannot be held liable for a hazard if its employees were not aware of it.
d. lose, because he should have been more careful.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1 characters.