Question

Police used a thermal imager to scan Kyllo's home because they had information that he was growing marijuana in his home. Officers did not have a warrant and claimed the search was in plain view. The Supreme Court ruled that:
a. use of a thermal imager did not alter the fact that the officers observed the marijuana in plain view.
b. use of a thermal imager to explore details of a home that in the past would have been unknown without a physical intrusion into the home is a search and subject to Fourth Amendment requirements.
c. thermal imagers are common devices and, therefore, the search was in plain view.
d. the use of a thermal imager is always illegal.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1 characters.