Question

Nellie owned a Great Dane that she entered in dog shows on a regular basis. When she went on vacation, she asked her neighbor, Wilson, to take care of the dog. Wilson agreed to do so without asking to be paid for his services. Before leaving, Nellie gave Wilson instructions about how to care for the dog, but Wilson did not follow her instructions or restrain the dog. While Nellie was on vacation, a car hit the dog when it ran into the street. Which of the following statements is true?
A. A bailment does not exist because Nellie did not pay Wilson anything to take care of the dog.
B. A bailment was created, but since it was a bailment for the sole benefit of the bailor, Wilson had no duty to care for the dog.
C. A bailment for the sole benefit of the bailor was created, which holds Wilson responsible for gross negligence.
D. A bailment for the sole benefit of the bailee was created, meaning that Wilson will be held strictly liable to Nellie, for the dog's injuries.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 275 characters.