Question

Kwik Delivery Company buys a truck from Lucky Vehicles, Inc., under a guaranty signed by Mina, Kwik's president, who writes "President" after her signature. When Kwik does not pay for the truck, Lucky sues Mina, who claims that she did not intend to be bound by the guaranty. The court would most likely rule in favor of
a. Lucky, because Mina's guaranty is unambiguous.
b. Lucky, because Mina works for Kwik.
c. Mina, because she did not intend to be bound by the guaranty.
d. Mina, because she signed only as a corporate officer.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1 characters.