Question

In Case 7.2, Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., the court decided that the railroad employee's conduct was not wrong in relation to Palsgraf but did not decide whether the conduct was negligent toward the man with the package (that led to Palsgraf's injury). If the court determined that the railroad employee was negligent with regard to the man with the package, would the railroad have been liable for the injury to Palsgraf?
a. Yes, because negligence to one party creates negligence to all other parties injured as a result.
b. No, because Palsgraf's injury was still not foreseeable.
c. Yes, because of the doctrine of assumption of risk.
d. No, because Palsgraf was also negligent.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1 characters.