Question

I.M. Handy was the sole proprietor of Handy's Upholstery Service. Green brought some items of furniture to Handy's place of business and left them there for the purpose of having them reupholstered. Handy and Green did not have any specific discussion concerning what Handy would charge for his services. Under these circumstances:
A. a bailment for the sole benefit of the bailor was created even though the parties did not specifically discuss compensation.
B. a bailment for mutual benefit was created which entitles Handy to compensation from Green for the reasonable value of his services.
C. a bailment was not created and hence, Handy is not liable to any payment.
D. a bailment was created only for the storage of property for which Handy is entitled only to storage services.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 198 characters.