Question

Identify an instance where the second statement explains the reason for the first statement.

A) Statement 1: Negotiations ended in a "walking away from the table" situation.

Statement 2: The negotiator was driven by hubris.

B) Statement 1: Negotiators failed to recognize and capitalize on their win-win potential.

Statement 2: Negotiation was conducted in a protected environment.

C) Statement 1: One of the negotiators made large concessions, resulting in a too-small share of the bargaining pie.

Statement 2: The negotiator was driven by pride and ego.

D) Statement 1: The best alternative was not chosen in a negotiation.

Statement 2: Both the parties were not interested in the outcome of the negotiation.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 204 characters.