Question

Fact Pattern 26-2
Attempting to cash a check drawn on First Bank, Gina, who is not a First Bank customer, refuses to provide a thumbprint. First Bank refuses to cash the check. Gina files a suit against the bank.Refer to Fact Pattern 26-2. On the basis of the determination in Case 26.1, Messing v. Bank of America, N.A., the court in the case of Gina v. First Bank is most likely to reason that requiring a thumbprint is
a. a "reasonable response to the rising incidence of check fraud."
b. not "reasonable identification" for a non-customer to cash a check.
c. "unreasonably inconvenient" for any party to cash a check.
d. unreliable "to authenticate a writing on a negotiable instrument."

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 1 characters.