Q&A Hero

Question

Case 9.1
Police stop Bill Stoner, a known drug dealer, for operating a vehicle with no tail lights, after he is observed pulling away from a parking lot in a high crime area know for drug transactions. Bill appears extremely nervous as he speaks with the officers. The primary officer requests the registration and insurance card for the vehicle. As Sam opens the glove box to retrieve the paperwork, the cover officer spots a hollow point bullets in the glove box. She notifies her partner and Sam is immediately removed from the car and frisked for possible weapons. The officer finds a loaded handgun in Bill's waist band and he placed under arrest. As the cover officer is securing the bullets, she notices Bill's cell phone on the front seat buzzing. She opens the phone and views multiple texts from Donny Bosco warning Bill that "The cops are in the area get my bag of weed and coke out of your trunk." The officers secure Bill in the patrol car and search the trunk of Bill's car. In the trunk they find a large black duffle bag containing two pounds of marijuana and two kilograms of cocaine.
Bill is transported back to headquarters and placed in an interrogation room. The arresting officer shows the duffle bag full of drugs to Bill and tells him "you're going away for a long time unless you talk". Bill is questioned about his association with Donny Bosco and his part in the distribution of drugs. Bill completes and signs a Miranda waiver form and then provides a videotaped confession in which he criminally implicates Donny Bosco as the drug distribution leader. In addition to the charges against Bill Stoner, Donny Bosco is indicted on several felony drug tracking charges.

At trial, the defense seeks to have the drugs in the trunk suppressed, claiming that the warrantless search of the defendant's cell phone lead to the search of the trunk and discovery of the drugs. What options would the prosecution have to counter the suppression of the evidence?
a. None as there are exceptions to the fruit of a poisonous tree doctrine.
b. The prosecution could counter the defense's motion with the derivative evidence rule, claiming that the drugs would have ultimately been discovered when police conduct the impound inventory of the defendant's car.
c. The prosecution could counter the defense's motion with the inevitable discovery rule, claiming that the drugs would have ultimately been discovered when police conduct the impound inventory of the defendant's car.
d. The prosecution could counter the defense's motion with the signed Miranda waiver form.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 58 characters.

Related questions

Q: What are the principal methods used at trial to test the testimony of witnesses?How does allowing hearsay interfere with those methods?
Q: If a person is engaging in conduct that is not meant to _____, this would generally not be treated as hearsay.
Q: The hearsay rule forbids only statements offered to prove the _____of the matter asserted.
Q: In the Federal Rules of Evidence, one form of statement that is specifically excluded from the definition of hearsay is a(n) _____________ by a party-opponent.
Q: The rule against hearsay and the _____ Amendment Confrontation Clause address similar problems.
Q: The Star Chamber trials are among the most infamous in English history. a. True b. False
Q: Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, certain types of prior statements by witnesses are excluded from the definition of hearsay. a. True b. False
Q: The 1603 trial of William Penn sparked interest in reforming the law of hearsay. a. True b. False
Q: Exceptions to the law of hearsay evidence tend to be simple and straight forward. a. True b. False
Q: What are the requirements of the physician"patient privilege? What are some of the exceptions created in some jurisdictions?
Q: What is the police"informant privilege? What is its rationale, and what are some exceptions to this privilege?
Q: The privilege against self-incrimination applies only to testimonial or _____________ evidence.
Q: The president of the U.S. has no privilege with regard to confidential communications with top advisors. a. True b. False
Q: Every jurisdiction recognizes a parent"child privilege. a. True b. False
Q: The attorney"client privilege was not recognized at common law. a. True b. False
Q: Courts have long held that judicial notice may be taken of _____theories that have been so established that they have "attained the status of "¦ law", a. scientific b. conceptual c. proven d. absolute
Q: About _____ of the states have statutes defining the clergy-penitent privilege, with a few other states recognizing the privilege by court decisions. a. one-quarter b. one-third c. half d. two-thirds
Q: An informant's privilege is not a(n) _____ privilege and must give way when there is a compelling need to protect the rights of the accused. a. administrative b. judicial c. prosecutorial d. absolute
Q: The marital privilege _____. a. was not recognized at common law b. is not recognized in federal courts c. is recognized in about half the states d. is recognized in all jurisdictions
Q: The oldest application of judicial notice is for _____. a. matters generally known within the community or state b. principles that are generally accepted by reputable scientists c. the identity of defendants d. published official records
Q: Judicial notice is permitted _____. a. in all jurisdictions except the federal courts b. in the federal courts but not state courts c. in a majority of jurisdictions d. in all jurisdictions
Q: Unlike Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals Co., the expert testimony in Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael was provided by a(n) _____. a. psychologist b. biologist c. engineer d. forensic scientist
Q: For many years prior to 1993, federal courts utilized the _____ test for the admissibility of scientific evidence. a. Ginsburg b. Alito c. Connor d. Frye
Q: Since adoption of Daubert in some states, the validity and reliability of the _____ test is no longer subject to judicial notice for purposes of proving guilt. a. RFD b. RSVP c. HMS d. HGN
Q: In the Daubert decision, the Supreme Court held that the admissibility of scientific evidence was governed by Rule _____ of the Federal Rules of Evidence. a. 402 b. 502 c. 602 d. 702
Q: Prior to the Supreme Court's Daubert decision, federal courts used a _____ test. a. general acceptance b. conditional relevance c. contingent admissibility d. consistency and reliability
Q: If the scientific theory and/or technique is accepted by higher courts, trial courts may take _____ of the validity of these theories and techniques. a. hearsay exceptions b. judicial notice c. positive objections d. conditional acceptance
Q: Circumstantial evidence is evidence that proves a fact in issue _____. a. indirectly or by inference b. directly by eyewitness testimony c. only by the use of presumptions d. by contradicting other evidence
Q: Proof is demonstrated by _____. a. evidence b. deductions c. inductions d. jury instructions
Q: The prosecution can overcome the presumption of innocence only by proving guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. a. True b. False

Subjects

Accounting Anthropology Archaeology Art History Banking Biology & Life Science Business Business Communication Business Development Business Ethics Business Law Chemistry Communication Computer Science Counseling Criminal Law Curriculum & Instruction Design Earth Science Economic Education Engineering Finance History & Theory Humanities Human Resource International Business Investments & Securities Journalism Law Management Marketing Medicine Medicine & Health Science Nursing Philosophy Physic Psychology Real Estate Science Social Science Sociology Special Education Speech Visual Arts