Question

Case 4.3
Police respond to the scene of an apparent arson incident which involved a vacant commercial office building. The fire was discovered by a passing patrol unit shortly after it had started. The initial officers on scene found all exterior doors looked and entry was forced to check for potential victims. Fire officials report signs and evidence of accelerants near each stairwell. Additionally they find an empty kerosene can outside the structure in the bushes by the property line. A premises history reveals that the property has been vacant for almost a year and has been for sale twice as long. Town records show several denied zoning and building adjustment applications over the past two years. There are numerous property maintenance violations for the property as well.

Detectives following up on the case find property owner Slim Shady uncooperative. He claims he knows nothing about the fire and that he was at home the entire night. Background investigations reveal that Mr. Shady also operates Shady Paint and Flooring Service. He owns a working van with the markings "Shady Paint and Flooring." Detectives also discover that Mr. Shady increased his insurance of the incident property six months prior to the fire.

As there are no eyewitnesses to the crime, detectives focus on identifying means, motive, and opportunity. If the case goes to trial, what must be shown for it to go to the determination of guilt?
a. means only
b. motive only
c. opportunity only
d. both motive and opportunity

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 51 characters.