Q&A Hero

Question

Case 11.1
Janet is a successful Colorado entrepreneur and has recently decided to open a recreational marijuana sales business in Denver, "High and Mighty." The state and county require operators of such businesses to acquire a license, hold a public meeting coordinated with the local and state license board, and other special procedures for this new and highly regulated enterprise. One holiday weekend, Detective Jones stops in and informs Janet that he is conducting a surprise inspection of the business to determine if Janet is complying with state record-keeping laws and other rules ensuring that minors are not being permitted to purchase the recreational marijuana. Janet has never been the subject of such a search and is concerned the detective's presence will scare away customers. There are 20 customers in line, waiting to purchase recreational marijuana. Detective Jones enters the store over Janet's objection and despite her request that he produce a search warrant. He enters her office and reviews her paperwork relevant to state record-keeping laws. He notes several irregularities and documents them. When Detective Jones returns to the sales area, he finds that Janet and her staff have continued to serve customers while he was in the office. Detective Jones checks the ID of several people who have made purchases and finds that two of them are under age under state law to purchase marijuana. While Detective Jones is checking IDs, one of the patrons (Bobby) waiting to buy marijuana says, "Man, I can"t believe this guy is giving us such a hard time. What a bummer!" Detective Jones directs this man to empty his pockets on a nearby table and finds he has cocaine. Detective Jones arrests Bobby for possession of cocaine, cites Janet for violating state law for poor record-keeping and charges her with providing marijuana to underage patrons.
Can Detective Jones enter and search "High and Mighty" to ensure and enforce compliance with marijuana recreational sales regulations without a search warrant?
a. No, a search warrant is required from a neutral and detached magistrate with experience in marijuana cases.
b. No, unless Janet gives consent in advance to search the "High and Mighty."
c. No, the U.S. Supreme Court held in 1978 that a closely regulated industry can only be inspected without a warrant when the owner requests one.
d. Yes, the U.S. Supreme Court held in 1978 that there is an exception to the FourthAmendment for regulated industries and when an entrepreneur embarks uponsuch a business, he/she has voluntarily chosen to subject the business to a fullarsenal of governmental regulation.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 84 characters.

Related questions

Q: What are the principal methods used at trial to test the testimony of witnesses?How does allowing hearsay interfere with those methods?
Q: If a person is engaging in conduct that is not meant to _____, this would generally not be treated as hearsay.
Q: The hearsay rule forbids only statements offered to prove the _____of the matter asserted.
Q: In the Federal Rules of Evidence, one form of statement that is specifically excluded from the definition of hearsay is a(n) _____________ by a party-opponent.
Q: The rule against hearsay and the _____ Amendment Confrontation Clause address similar problems.
Q: The Star Chamber trials are among the most infamous in English history. a. True b. False
Q: Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, certain types of prior statements by witnesses are excluded from the definition of hearsay. a. True b. False
Q: The 1603 trial of William Penn sparked interest in reforming the law of hearsay. a. True b. False
Q: Exceptions to the law of hearsay evidence tend to be simple and straight forward. a. True b. False
Q: What are the requirements of the physician"patient privilege? What are some of the exceptions created in some jurisdictions?
Q: What is the police"informant privilege? What is its rationale, and what are some exceptions to this privilege?
Q: The privilege against self-incrimination applies only to testimonial or _____________ evidence.
Q: The president of the U.S. has no privilege with regard to confidential communications with top advisors. a. True b. False
Q: Every jurisdiction recognizes a parent"child privilege. a. True b. False
Q: The attorney"client privilege was not recognized at common law. a. True b. False
Q: Courts have long held that judicial notice may be taken of _____theories that have been so established that they have "attained the status of "¦ law", a. scientific b. conceptual c. proven d. absolute
Q: About _____ of the states have statutes defining the clergy-penitent privilege, with a few other states recognizing the privilege by court decisions. a. one-quarter b. one-third c. half d. two-thirds
Q: An informant's privilege is not a(n) _____ privilege and must give way when there is a compelling need to protect the rights of the accused. a. administrative b. judicial c. prosecutorial d. absolute
Q: The marital privilege _____. a. was not recognized at common law b. is not recognized in federal courts c. is recognized in about half the states d. is recognized in all jurisdictions
Q: The oldest application of judicial notice is for _____. a. matters generally known within the community or state b. principles that are generally accepted by reputable scientists c. the identity of defendants d. published official records
Q: Judicial notice is permitted _____. a. in all jurisdictions except the federal courts b. in the federal courts but not state courts c. in a majority of jurisdictions d. in all jurisdictions
Q: Unlike Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals Co., the expert testimony in Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael was provided by a(n) _____. a. psychologist b. biologist c. engineer d. forensic scientist
Q: For many years prior to 1993, federal courts utilized the _____ test for the admissibility of scientific evidence. a. Ginsburg b. Alito c. Connor d. Frye
Q: Since adoption of Daubert in some states, the validity and reliability of the _____ test is no longer subject to judicial notice for purposes of proving guilt. a. RFD b. RSVP c. HMS d. HGN
Q: In the Daubert decision, the Supreme Court held that the admissibility of scientific evidence was governed by Rule _____ of the Federal Rules of Evidence. a. 402 b. 502 c. 602 d. 702
Q: Prior to the Supreme Court's Daubert decision, federal courts used a _____ test. a. general acceptance b. conditional relevance c. contingent admissibility d. consistency and reliability
Q: If the scientific theory and/or technique is accepted by higher courts, trial courts may take _____ of the validity of these theories and techniques. a. hearsay exceptions b. judicial notice c. positive objections d. conditional acceptance
Q: Circumstantial evidence is evidence that proves a fact in issue _____. a. indirectly or by inference b. directly by eyewitness testimony c. only by the use of presumptions d. by contradicting other evidence
Q: Proof is demonstrated by _____. a. evidence b. deductions c. inductions d. jury instructions
Q: The prosecution can overcome the presumption of innocence only by proving guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. a. True b. False

Subjects

Accounting Anthropology Archaeology Art History Banking Biology & Life Science Business Business Communication Business Development Business Ethics Business Law Chemistry Communication Computer Science Counseling Criminal Law Curriculum & Instruction Design Earth Science Economic Education Engineering Finance History & Theory Humanities Human Resource International Business Investments & Securities Journalism Law Management Marketing Medicine Medicine & Health Science Nursing Philosophy Physic Psychology Real Estate Science Social Science Sociology Special Education Speech Visual Arts