Question

Sally rented a motorized chain saw from E-Z Rental Company. While Sally was using the saw as specified by the directions, the saw "grabbed" and caused a piece of wood to fly into her eye, seriously injuring her. A subsequent investigation showed that the saw grabbed because of a defect in the chain mechanism. Under these circumstances:
A. E-Z is liable for Sally's injuries only if there is a violation of an express warranty regarding the quality of the saw.
B. E-Z is liable for Sally's injuries if it knew of the defect in the saw when it rented it to Sally, but failed to warn her of the defect.
C. E-Z is not liable for Sally's injuries if the UCC's implied warranty of merchantability principles were applied by the court.
D. E-Z is not liable for Sally's injuries since the bailment was for the sole benefit of the bailee.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 315 characters.