Question

Jamie works as a barista at Coffee-Hutz, a coffeehouse in New Jersey, with 60 other employees. He has been working there full time for 18 months. One day his wife called with some bad news. His mother-in-law and 10-year-old daughter, Delores, were severely injured in a car accident while returning from school. Jamie has asked his employer for leave under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). In this scenario, which of the following statements is true?

A. Granting the leave is entirely at the discretion of the employer; the employer does not permit him the leave as it would hamper the functioning of Coffee-Hutz.

B. Jamie is not entitled to the leave because the number of hours he has worked during the preceding 12 months is less than what is required by the act.

C. Jamie is entitled to leave for taking care of his mother-in-law and daughter, regardless of his daughters age.

D. Jamie is only entitled to the leave to take care of his daughter.

E. Jamie is not entitled to the leave because the provisions of the FMLA Act apply only to females.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 402 characters.