Question

Briefly describe the main defenses to negligence.

Contributory negligence and assumption of the risk are two traditional defenses to negligence. They are both based on the idea that everyone has a duty to exercise reasonable care for his/her own safety, and that people who fail to exercise such care should not be able to recover because their own behavior helped cause their injuries. Since contributory negligence can produce harsh results, some courts have adopted the doctrine of last clear chance, which holds that even though the plaintiff was negligent, he or she can still recover if it can be shown that the defendant had the "last clear chance" to avoid the harm. Recently, most states have adopted a comparative negligence system, which is seen as fairer because it distributes the cost of the accident according to both plaintiff's and defendant's fault. It may be pure or mixed. Most states have adopted a "pure" comparative negligence system which allows plaintiffs to recover the portion of their losses not attributable to their fault. A few states have adopted a "mixed" comparative fault system under which, plaintiffs are barred from recovery if they are as much or more at fault for their injuries as defendant.

Answer

This answer is hidden. It contains 0 characters.